Not expecting to even register, I checked this site’s ranking with small seo tools. I was not surprised to see a ranking of zero and no specific country, but I was surprised to see a “reach” of over 10 million. Ngaro.online only get a few site visits a day and most of those are web crawlers.
Maybe I misunderstood what it means, or maybe it’s an indication of cyber attacks by bots and/or haters. So here are some more results that I don’t know what they mean. 😏
you for your e-mail “tax, tax and more tax” earlier today. You say
National supports greening the vehicle fleet through incentives, not
penalties. You say your polices saw the number of electric vehicles on
our roads increase hugely.
Well … I don’t support “greening the vehicle fleet”, because New Zealand simply doesn’t have a problem with vehicle emissions.
Electric vehicles might well suit urban commuters, but they are not
fit for our economy that is based on agriculture, while commuters need
incentives to leave the car at home rather than congesting city centers
at rush hour.
Incentives are just like taxes, because ultimately our country has to
pay for them one way or the other, so I think electric vehicles should
pay road usage charges just like the diesel vehicles.
We need a government with the courage to defend our economy against
international competition from countries who really don’t care about
green issues, especially because “climate emergency” is a myth, CO2 is
essential to life on Earth and the free market will regulate more
effectively than an army of bureaucrats.
Here are some of the replies I gave to their consultation:
What incenses me is the sheer stupidity of these “experts”. They went
blundering into Paris agreement and have been chomping at the bit to
declare a climate emergency ever since.
Don’t they understand how very little the whole of humanity can
possibly do to affect global climate, even if we were all acting in
unison? Don’t they know that rival countries are going to continue doing
100s of times more damage than New Zealand ever could? All we will
achieve is handing our productive industries to them and bankrupting our
own economy in the process.
They make so many dumb assumptions, but once we have whole fleets of
EV’s charging overnight, cheap rate electricity prices will disappear.
One way or the other our country is going to have to pay for the roads
for all the vehicles that use them. All of their cunningly calculated
economies will disappear faster than they can regulate.
We may even have to build more coal power stations to meet increased demand which completely defeats the whole purpose.
Their consultation was totally based on the assumption that we, the
people, agree about the need to reduce carbon footprint artificially,
but I for one don’t. I think, let fossil fuels run their natural course
while we as an independent nation focus on preparing for the future with
a sustainable and skilled population. To retain our own culture and
sovereignty and above all, free from all the crap raining down from the
I may come back and add some more writing and would be happy to engage intelligent discussion.
I wrote that crippling our own industry while importing produce from countries that continue to pollute is the dumbest thing we can do for the climate and that we should instead protect our industry and economy and prepare for inevitable coming changes as the Earth returns to her warmer high carbon natural state..
I asked that they stop letting the UN dictate policy and start representing what we, the people of New Zealand are asking for.
Police serve to fight crime and so I question why they are tasked with issuing gun licenses. We don’t expect them to be involved in issuing driving licenses even though they deal with driving offenses.
The Chch mosque shooting precipitated a government gun buy back, but the police have always been able to revoke gun licenses and confiscate weapons from people that they don’t trust. IDK anything about this particular case that was mentioned on GAB, but I just want to make some observations.
“concerns about mental health” is far too open to interpretation. Anyone with a grudge can spread rumors and make allegations, but without a professional assessment it should have no standing. The point I want to make here is that character assessment should have been done before any fire arms license was issued.
The point about weapons not being adequately secured could be a concern, as we don’t want them falling into the hands of criminals, but shouldn’t he just get a warning, or a fine for that?
In any case there is little evidence of legal gun ownership by New Zealand citizens being a problem, and subsequent to a change in regulations, I think one chould at least allow the owners to export their weapons to somewhere they are still legal.
Alas, our local MP, Ruth Dyson, is an utterly useless virtue signalling yes-sayer who will do nothing of any consequence.:
“Ruth was involved in numerous women’s organisations, environmental groups and social movements during the early 1970s.”
“She held a number of positions within the Party, including Women’s Representative, Executive Member, Senior Vice President, before becoming the Party’s President in 1988.”
I need to find some other way because the police are not taking non violent crimes seriously despite the devastating consequence it can have on our lives.
Meanwhile social media like Facebook trade without restraint in stolen property and there is nothing to help people identify if they have been reported as stolen. The “Snap” data base is a joke and it’s not clear where and by whom, if ever, serial numbers will be checked for stolen property.